Spring at the Beach

Spring at the Beach


Romantic Celebrity Cultures & Weddings

Embed from Getty Images

When is it right to press the pause button on the “celebrity life”?

Celebrity marriages, the kind that so frequents in Los Angeles, are quite different from ordinary marriages, even if they are so very delicious to read about, for an #ambitious Londoner, like me. They are, probably a billion dollar market alone, because the wedding is inclusive of big expenditures, such as the wedding dress, the perfect flowers, the elite guest list, and the venue. The press coverage alone is meant to knock most average New Yorkers unconscious because it is such a grand investment into a series of separate romantic publicity stunts. The whole idea behind this kind of a marriage in a segment of Far Eastern culture is to shun the idea of feminism: these women, have absolutely no worries at all about professionally getting ahead, about demanding better working conditions, higher wages and the same sets of privileges that has been open to men, since the beginning of time.

Sure! The fight might be a hard one, when class is out there put into question for the male species, but it definitely has no gender-bender motive. 

Is life really all about love? To so many women, yes!

In China, lately, many women are going down a path that so many, pathetically, would absolutely die to go down, really: exchanging a career with a big wedding. I don’t find the thought hard to grasp at all because in Hollywood so many role models do, according to popular beliefs, fail to live up to the hype that made them big in the first place. It is so commonplace to see so many young actresses exchange their morality to keep a man, because it is just so tough to say goodbye to the love of their life, even if they come off as desperate, clingy and needy: also known as Taylor Swift and Angelina Jolie. Some supermodels or even models (basically, “attractive women”) get married to some man not much of a looker (basically, ‘ugly men’), in comparison to their brainless previous conquests, whilst others completely disappear from the gossip circuit because for example, the wedding they courted so badly suddenly breaks down and the couple in question chose to be quiet about it, rather than sounding the trumpet, like they did for the preparations leading upto the two’s BIG DAY.

The weddings appear lucrative to certain women, I imagine, because they have a mindset that is completely different from the kinds sported by most women in the world: a marriage is absurdly more interesting and babies are worth coveting more, than sheer hard work and the daily professional grind. 

In the end, the general idea is that ‘marriage on the cards or not?’ should not define a woman, like so many women in China. Looks, intelligence and ambition, might attract men in throngs, comparatively, but the point stands that a lot of women nowadays feel they simply, desperately need to get married because the job market is full of unemployment figureheads, and to young women that isn’t a lucrative idea of life. Rather than slog your way to the top, women also spend endless hours working on their beauty and social regimen, to impress wealthy men, these days and the percentages are on the rise than times past. This social outlook in China could lead to a marriage for the ladies, it could even practically save their futures but in the midst of it all these women also have to often face worries about their men no longer remaining interested in their trophy wives, when they have had a baby and aged.

Celebrity marriages, at the end of the day, are a means for many stars to remain in the news, and most of the time it is precisely because, as trophy wives they are perhaps doing far better work than the kind that made most of them recognisable faces in the first place. 

A new brand of love for getting married super-early and super-rich, is challenging conventional notions of feminism in China because women of today, if they want to have the same sets of rights as men, they should be willing to work as hard as them for the same sets of jobs. Women should not feel like they have to prioritise a marriage over earning an income, only because a portion of mainstream society finds that thought perfectly understandable for some women. These values should be nurtured in both the Chinese and the Western society. Thoughts such as these, should be highlighted, that a woman’s place does not always have to be inside the home, and certainly not something as morally mortifying as a dependent partner to a poor, middle-income or a very rich man.

The #Brunch Look

The #Brunch Look


Casetify apple iphone case
155 MYR – casetify.com

Hydrating mask
270 MYR – ahalife.com

Nars cosmetic
100 MYR – beauty.com

Sephora Collection lip treatment
49 MYR – sephora.com

General Foam turquoise home decor
390 MYR – target.com

Dot Bo christmas home decor
110 MYR – dotandbo.com

Tsar Nicoulai Select Caviar
775 MYR – williams-sonoma.com

Lace & Glory

Lace & Glory


Dolce Gabbana lace cocktail dress
10,240 MYR – harrods.com

ASOS square toe shoes
235 MYR – asos.com

Shoulder bag
305 MYR – harrods.com

Karl Lagerfeld comic book
135 MYR – karl.com

MAKE UP FOR EVER oil free foundation
140 MYR – sephora.com

Yves Saint Laurent lip gloss makeup
145 MYR – boots.com

Flower wall art
285 MYR – wayfair.com

Powder Power

Powder Power


Roberto Cavalli jacket
7,940 MYR – harrods.com

5,310 MYR – harrods.com

Shoulder bag
305 MYR – harrods.com

Nars cosmetic
135 MYR – liberty.co.uk

Flower stem

Nina Ricci Crinkle Satin Skirt | Harrods
305 MYR – harrods.com

Powder Power

Powder Power


Roberto Cavalli ripped jeans
5,145 MYR – harrods.com

Chloé brown purse
8,050 MYR – harrods.com

Nars cosmetic
135 MYR – liberty.co.uk

Flower stem

Etro Floral Peplum Gilet | Harrods
305 MYR – harrods.com

The Nuremberg Trials & An Absence Of Democracy 

When Adolf Hitler came to power, Nazi Germany killed so many innocent Jewish people. But the Nuremberg Trials is what sought to finally bring some justice to that violent aspect of Germany’s history


One of the most disturbing episodes in the history of Nazi Germany, was The Nuremberg Trials. It was a good act of tearing democratic values apart, just so that the Allied powers from the Second World War could finally be spotted bringing some kind of justice to all those persecuted Jewish people, by the Nazis, at the end of the war. When Germany was defeated in the Second World War, the Allied powers had no right to colour the Nazi regime’s whole history, with the trials, and I agree with the prevailing historical thought that the event seems to have been driven by lunatics, with a bitter taste for lynching.

Where were the Allied powers, when the Nazis were wrongfully targeting and killing Jewish people? Why did the Allied powers, wait until Germany was defeated in the Second World War, to show their true colours, upfront, and participate in the debauchery of democracy, to bring some justice to persecuted European Jewish people?

The Nazi Empire systematically murdered somewhere around 6 million Jews. The trials aimed to bring to spotlight the war crimes committed by numerous Nazi leaders, when they killed innocent European Jewish people. To escape humiliation, and perhaps even the trials, some Nazi leaders committed suicide, but the ones alive were either hanged or sentenced to long prison times, and given a life behind bars. Corruption, which supplies money to change global landscapes, is also another proper definition of European Jewry, it is not some brand of exoticism. But the Allied powers never bothered with bringing that thought up, and look how that is looking in today’s democratic world, which actually celebrates freedom of speech?


Cowardice was definitely at play in Nazi Germany for expecting to escape such mass murder of the European Jewish, but this level of ripping apart democratic values in Europe, for it? From 1945 to 1949, thirteen trials were carried out against perpetrators of peace for humanity: the prosecuted felt they were innocent and were completely helpless to at least properly defend themselves in a democratic continent. The trials were aiming to be fast for people connected to Nazi Germany, such as military leaders, doctors and German industrialists and even poised as a ludicrous roadmap for international justice. There is no proof whatsoever that, that particular roadmap helped much, apart from prosecuting war criminals in the genocide that happened in Rwanda (1994) and the former European state of Yugoslavia (1993), and the late trial of Nazi official, Adolf Eichmann, in the early sixties.

The trials are a vehicle of criticism too, since they happened and it is shocking to learn the Allied powers, were so bitter about Nazi Germany, they waited until the defeat to draft laws, first, to press charges against crimes committed by Nazis, in the past. Where was France, the United States, China, the Soviet Union and the United Kingdoms’s confidence during the Second World War then, that Germany was most definitely going to lose the war? Where were their sense of justice for European Jewish people then? Why did the Allied powers not draft those laws then to at least attempt to save the European Jewish people from the massacre happening right before everyone’s eyes? The Nuremberg Trials shifted from following the international legal structure, to an American legal structure, for divisions cracked open between the Allied powers, following Germany’s defeat in the Second World War. Although, the trials certainly aimed to bring justice to European Jewish people, it did very little, too late, to heal their wounds from the Second World War, I believe, by making democracy look like an absolute joke on the national stage, at Nuremberg.